LFS-5.1pre2 space figures (ch6+)

Jochen Schroeder jschrod at uni-muenster.de
Mon May 10 03:50:06 PDT 2004

Ian Molton wrote:
> On Sun, 09 May 2004 13:29:28 +0200
> Allard Welter <allard at nospam.nl> wrote:
>>I Wasn't aware of these units - thanks for the ref. A definate +1 for SI 
>>units. Folks will encounter them sooner or later, so why not through 
>>LFS, it is a teaching tool after all.
> NONONO. dont. stupid nasty SI dumbass unit rearrangement.
What you're failing to see, is that this is actually not a "stupid nasty 
SI dumbass unit rearrangement" (emphasis on rearrangement), but it's 
actually making up for a stupid nasty dumbass ignoring of sientific 
standarts by computer "scientists". a kilo is 10^3 if everybody made up 
their own definition of kilo we might as well go back to the mediaval 
times where every town had a measurement of a cubit (dunno if that's the 
right word just looked it up in a dictionary) and it had a different 
length in every town. Just because it has been used for a long time 
doesn't make it right, although it might be more convenient for people 
_currently_ involved in computers, because they don't have to relearn 
something, in 30 years time nobody will give a horses ass that a 
kilobyte used to be 1024 bytes.


replies to lfs-chat please

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list