Kernel page, once again

Matthew Burgess matthew at
Wed Jun 16 14:18:06 PDT 2004

On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 21:56:02 +0100
Ian Molton <spyro at> wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 19:48:17 +0100
> Matthew Burgess <matthew at> wrote:
> > > We pick the EXT3 filesystem for example because of it's journaling
> > > capabilities and as a small extension to EXT2, is very stable.
> > 
> > Minor nitpick - I think the book is still on ext2!
> Theres no excuse for that - the ext 3 code is well proven and will
> fall back to ext2 if necessary. Can we upgrade this?

Yes - I mentioned it on one of the Wiki pages I think.  But I see that
as a trivial upgrade in comparison to the other changes this thread
touches on, so it's low priority now.  Of course, if one of you editors
has some time and wants to tackle it, then by all means do.



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list