From glibc-2.2.x to glibc-2.3.x

Tushar T tush at
Sat Oct 26 19:25:02 PDT 2002

Greg Schafer wrote:

>C'mon guys! Have I convinced you yet? The patch is obviously the easiest way
>to go! Lets just do it! No hacks, no risk, just normal LFS and no grief!
I still tend to think that MSB's solution is the most elegant and 
correct. Packages should be patched only if they fix some incorrect 

The major difference between LFS and the other distributions is that 
they have to support the existing static libraries and binaries, we 
don't. Gentoo cannot tell its users to recompile all the existing 
packages after installing glibc.

Tushar Teredesai
LFS ID: 1377

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list