glibc-2.3 segfaults solved!
jim at jg555.com
Mon Oct 7 14:54:06 PDT 2002
Wouldn't the patch here fix that problem also.
"Greg Schafer" <gschafer at zip.com.au> wrote in message
news:20021006135810.GA14854 at tigers-lfs.nsw.bigpond.net.au...
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 03:26:19PM +0200, Matthias Benkmann wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:35:02 +1000 Greg Schafer <gschafer at zip.com.au>
> > wrote:
> > > I s'pose we could just revert the offending patch and hope for the
> > > But I'm not sure of the ramifications.
> > Revert patches in glibc just to faciliate a one-time transition? That's
> > even uglier than using sed on a binary.
> I detect a bit of humour in there MSB, even tho' there was no smiley..
> Oh well, it made me chuckle :)
> But that wasn't the response I was expecting.. More like "oh cool, here
> is something I would just love to get my teeth into and help debug!"
> Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
> and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev