Here is the fix! (was Re: LFS build method flawed?)
chris at stockwith.co.uk
Wed Jul 10 10:28:45 PDT 2002
Greg Schafer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 09:19:59AM +0200, Erika Pacholleck wrote:
>> Total chaos here, I don't seem to understand anything now.
>> machine i586-pc-linux
>> book version cvs 06-30: no patch mentioned
>> binutils is 2.12.1
>> glibc 2.2.5
>> gcc 3.1
>> all dependeny progs dynamically installed
>> trying to recompile gcc
>> hidden support = no
Same here too.
> - the cause is due to gcc-3.1's configure script not correctly
> detecting the binutils version (2.12.1) which makes it think
> our binutils doesn't have support for the ".hidden assembler
> configure script still doesn't detect the correct binutils
> version because it doesn't know to look in $LFS/static/bin which
> is where we install binutils in Chapter 5 (it doesn't search the
> PATH either)
I am not using /static, OK I am guilty of not following the book.
I just overwrite the static versions with the dynamic versions just
like we used to do it.
Also I am building chapter 5 with binutils version (2.12.1)
So why does it not find it when it is the right place
I got a patch for bug 377, memset
I just got your patch too, many thanks.
Any more patches around?
> echo "#define HAVE_GAS_HIDDEN 1" >> gcc/auto-host.h &&
Thanks for this too
Please confirm that I apply both patches, then do the above hack
for chapters 5 and 6
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev