LFS build method flawed?
gschafer at zip.com.au
Thu Jul 4 16:53:48 PDT 2002
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 10:39:43AM -0400, jsmaby at virgo.umeche.maine.edu wrote:
> > 2. We build a bad static gcc due to the bad binutils version
> This shouldn't be a problem since we do make bootstrap.
No. Please re-read my earlier message entitled
"gcc-3.1 versus glibc-2.2.5 - make check failures"
The current cvs LFS *is* flawed due to a bug in gcc-3.1.
We end up with an incorrectly compiled glibc.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev