LFS build method flawed?

Greg Schafer gschafer at zip.com.au
Thu Jul 4 16:53:48 PDT 2002

On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 10:39:43AM -0400, jsmaby at virgo.umeche.maine.edu wrote:
> > 2. We build a bad static gcc due to the bad binutils version
> This shouldn't be a problem since we do make bootstrap.

No. Please re-read my earlier message entitled 
"gcc-3.1 versus glibc-2.2.5 - make check failures"

The current cvs LFS *is* flawed due to a bug in gcc-3.1.

We end up with an incorrectly compiled glibc.

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list