[OT] Re: new subscriber and lfs built with gcc-3.0.3 and glibc-2.2.5

Didier Bodineau Didier.Bodineau at wanadoo.fr
Mon Feb 4 09:40:04 PST 2002


Jesse Tie-Ten-Quee wrote:
> 
> Yo,
> 
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 10:53:51AM -0500, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> > Ah, so I'm sure then you appreciate the easy of installing LFS these days
> > compared to LFS-1.0 ;)
> 
> You know, lfs-dev use to be lfs-discuss, and on Feb 9th, it's two year
> anniversary will hit.  I've spend a bit of time reading some of the old
> original posts, and each time i do so, it just reminds me how far LFS
> and everyone involved with this project, has come.
> 
> Heh, I think next time i hear someone say that LFS is "too hard" i'm
> going to ask them to consider doing 1.x.  I remenber when we didn't even
> compile are own compiler... :)
> 
> --
> Jesse Tie-Ten-Quee  ( highos at linuxfromscratch dot org )
> --
> Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
> and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
I must admit that lfs-1.0 was rather difficult for me to obtain to work,
I'm not sure I managed until lfs-1.2 or lfs-1.3 gor sure.
-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list