FW: About the extra mailinglist
sth at andrew.cmu.edu
Fri Jan 19 10:38:16 PST 2001
These are the extensions from comp.sys.be (as in BeOS)
If there are to be new mailing lists, then I move that use two or more of
these names. Help and misc are my choices, with announce being a close
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> > Then what about having lfs-apps, lfs-chatter, and linux-chatter (or
> > chatter/non-lfs-chatter/etc)?
> > Extending your reasoning above for having lfs-chatter and linux as separate
> > lists, what about people who want to read/ask/respond about installing
> > package x on their LFS system, but don't care about threads such as
> > "Should we advertise LFS", which would be mixed together in the lfs-chatter
> > list if lfs-apps is shut down.
> lfs-apps is shutdown but in place of it will be lfs-problems (though the more
> i think about that name the less I like it. Perhaps retain the lfs-apps name
> is best in the end).
> To repsond to your X/LFS advertisement:
> problems with X is for lfs-problems
> Should we advertise LFS is for lfs-chatter.
> so if you don't want the LFS advertisement don't subscribe to lfs-chatter. I
> don't see the problem there really.
> Gerard Beekmans
> -*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
> Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
> and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message
Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev