Jeffrey B. Ferland autocracy at
Sun Jan 7 11:48:30 PST 2001

Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> On January  6, 2001 05:09 pm, Filippo Erik Negroni wrote:
> > Does anybody know why in the 2.4 kernel they still recommend egcs-1.1.2
> > compiler instead of gcc-2.95.2?
> 2.95.2 is still pretty buggy. Although it works just fine for most of us, in
> some situatons it won't compile a kernel properly (or so I've been told).
> gcc-2.95.3 should fix most of those outstanding bugs

Does this meant that gcc-2.95.3 is out? Or are we waiting for that too?


Unsubscribe: send email to lfs-discuss-request at
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list