Some thoughts.

Andy Peeters andy.peeters at
Tue Jul 18 11:39:04 PDT 2000

> 2.3.6 which will be released in a couple of days is very stable (it's
> actually the second last version before I expect 2.4 - the next stable
> to be released) but still oficially called unstable. If you follow
> instructions in 2.3.5b to the letter you will not end up with a working
> LFS system. That's why it's not stable (although 2.3.6 will give you a
> working LFS system if you do it literally by the book).

Nice. I have a portable where Linux should be installed on and I think I'll
going to try
that using 2.3.6.

Greetings, Andy.

Mail archive:
IRC access: server: port: 6667 channel: #LFS
Unsubscribe: email lfs-discuss-request at and put
"unsubscribe" (without the quotation marks) in the body of the message
(no subject is required)

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list