binutils version

Thomas T. Veldhouse veldy at veldy.net
Sat Jul 8 13:23:40 PDT 2000



On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, Tomislav Greguric wrote:

> [report about binutils-2.[9,10]* snipped]
> > I can't say if this is just my own problem or a more general one.
> 
> A general one, in this case: it has been reported a few times on this
> list that binutils-2.9.5.0.x (especially for x=46) sometimes create
> bad code (I've heard 2.9.* is not considered to be a stable release).
>

Only 2.9.5.* is not stable code.  2.9.1* IS stable code.  At least those
version found on the www.kernel.org mirrors.

Tom Veldhouse
veldy at veldy.net

--
Mail archive: http://www.pcrdallas.com/mail-archives/lfs-discuss
IRC access: server: irc.linuxfromscratch.org port: 6667 channel: #LFS
Unsubscribe: email lfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org and put
"unsubscribe" (without the quotation marks) in the body of the message
(no subject is required)



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list