binutils version

Thomas T. Veldhouse veldy at
Sat Jul 8 13:23:40 PDT 2000

On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, Tomislav Greguric wrote:

> [report about binutils-2.[9,10]* snipped]
> > I can't say if this is just my own problem or a more general one.
> A general one, in this case: it has been reported a few times on this
> list that binutils- (especially for x=46) sometimes create
> bad code (I've heard 2.9.* is not considered to be a stable release).

Only 2.9.5.* is not stable code.  2.9.1* IS stable code.  At least those
version found on the mirrors.

Tom Veldhouse
veldy at

Mail archive:
IRC access: server: port: 6667 channel: #LFS
Unsubscribe: email lfs-discuss-request at and put
"unsubscribe" (without the quotation marks) in the body of the message
(no subject is required)

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list