Fairy tales for adults
d95-bli at nada.kth.se
Thu Feb 13 14:51:51 PST 2003
JDrabb at tampabay.rr.com (James Drabb) writes:
> Billions of people around the world have a sense
> of a spirit or inner-self. From the earliest written history,
> man has had a sense of spirit, and has searched for understanding.
> There is something in most people of the world that makes them
> have this "deeper" feeling of self, of being connected to
> something bigger, of having a spirit. Billions of people around
> the world and since the bigging of man, have had an inner feeling
> of GOD or god(s) or even just an inner spirit. *You* might not have
> or had this sense, but you cannot discredited it since it is somehting
> that has affected an uncountable number of humans.
I don't think that this says anything about wether a god (or several,
according to some religions) really exists or not. It says something
about the human mind for sure, but nothing more.
> Yet, in all the
> history of science, not one scientist or experiment has been able
> to *disprove* that GOD or god(s) exist. And according to your own
> words, this is the ultimate test of a theory.
I'm sorry but this is ridiculous. You are confusing belief with
science. To be able to disprove the existance of a god(s) you have to
set up a falsifiable experiment. /I/ cannot do that, since I have no
conception of a god whatsoever.
> The theory of a spirit,
> GOD or god(s) has withstood the test of time, and has not been disproven
> scientifically. This doesn't mean that *you* personally need to believe
> in GOD or an inner spirit. But to totally deny it shows that you are
> not looking at it scientifically, but only applying your own personal
On the contrary. I would say that scientifically, the burden of proof
is on the believer. I respect your religious beliefs, but now you are
trying to say they are somehow indirectly scientifically proven, which
is not true.
> 1. Can science disprove that
> GOD (or god(s)) or an inner spirit exists.
Only if you can set up a falsifiable experiment.
> 2. Can science give me an explanation (with tangible scientific
> proof) of how the mass of the universe came into being? Please
> don't ask me to believe by blind faith that all the mass that was
> released from the "big bang" just always existed. That is not
> scientifically viable.
The scientific answer is: "We just don't know for sure yet, but we've
come a long way in our understanding." I'm quite comfortable to simply
admit that we don't know yet. You can of course choose what to believe
in by blind faith.
War on Iraq, expected # of killed Civilians:
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-chat' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-chat