Fwd: Fwd: dietlibc achievement: a working system without glibc
highos at linuxfromscratch.org
Fri May 3 01:13:09 PDT 2002
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 04:22:02AM +0200, Jeroen Coumans wrote:
> Guess I can use that old 486/8MB RAM for file/http/ftp server after
> Does it work with X or tinyX too? (Anybody try tinyX btw?)
It should. I know there are quite a few fans of this idea on IRC that
have been talking about doing it, just for the sake of it, thou I don't
know anyone that has.
I've been a fan of the BusyBox/TinyLogin family and have been
considering switching GNU Glibc with uClibc, just to see how possible it
would be, i don't mean compiling everything static, like they seem to
have done, but actually just switching the libraries around and trying
to make as little modifications as possible on a normal LFS build.
I had taken a quick look to see how possible it is, and from what i can
tell, one could do this, the majority of standard GNU package's seem to
compile and run with uClibc both as static and dynamically linked, thou
I have heard a few problems with GNU GCC, etc.
Dunno, it would be interesting, that's for sure.. thou I have *much*
better things to work on then this ;)) (I keep telling myself that thou
Jesse Tie-Ten-Quee ( highos at linuxfromscratch dot org )
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-chat' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-chat