cvs commit: LFS/FAQ why-not-version.xml

sklein at sklein at
Thu May 29 12:25:30 PDT 2003

sklein      03/05/29 15:25:30

  Modified:    FAQ      why-not-version.xml
  More specific warnings for the flex thing (Evanidus in #lfs-support)
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.9       +2 -1      LFS/FAQ/why-not-version.xml
  Index: why-not-version.xml
  RCS file: /home/cvsroot/LFS/FAQ/why-not-version.xml,v
  retrieving revision 1.8
  retrieving revision 1.9
  diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
  --- why-not-version.xml	28 May 2003 22:19:42 -0000	1.8
  +++ why-not-version.xml	29 May 2003 19:25:30 -0000	1.9
  @@ -25,7 +25,8 @@
   XFree86, the latest HJL binutils, and using "flex -l" with modutils,
   which can be done with <ulink
  -However, you're on your own if you try this.
  +You will also encounter problems with bc, libidl, and perhaps more.
  +You're on your own if you try this.
   Don't expect any support.
   Version 2.5.27 is more likely to work without weird hacks.
   <!-- Chris on #lfs-support says the patch doesn't work
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-book' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-book mailing list