j2sdk and openoffice on latest unstable

Nathan Coulson conathan at gmail.com
Sun Oct 24 17:27:51 PDT 2004

On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 22:58:34 -0600, Archaic
<archaic at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 10:47:43PM -0600, Nathan Coulson wrote:
> I'm getting failures of a different type and from a different host, but
> just for the record, what version of OOo are you building? You said the
> latest BLFS, so I'm assuming 1.1.2? If so, there is a 1.1.3 out there.
> If you use that, the no-pam patch has one occurence of libpam.so that
> needs changed to libpam.so.0 to work apply.
> --
> Archaic

yep, 1.1.2.  [Usually, point releases dont scare me much, unless
there's a patch.  OpenOffice on the other hand has a bunch of patches,
and has alot within it].  I do remember it being somewhat more, well,
harder to compile (instruction wise) in the past, must have been

Nathan Coulson (conathan)
nathan at linuxfromscratch org
conathan at gmail com

More information about the blfs-support mailing list