gcc 3.x

Olivier ozhegan at yahoo.com
Sat Dec 29 10:44:19 PST 2001

--- newton at tiscali.no wrote:
> I have not done extensive testing of this system,
> but superficial checks indicate that it works.
> Can anyone suggest what might be wrong with
> such a procedure?  Am I going to run into
> trouble somewhere down the line?

   It depends on the optimization switches you used. I
wouldnt' trust gcc 3.x with switches higher than -O2
or other shake-my-opcodes options to compile
easy-to-crash software such as gcc itself, XFree,
glibc, the kernel, binutils and modutils.


  "Dans cet étrange carnaval
   on a vendu l'homo sapiens
   pour racheter du Néandertal
   Je vous attends!"
Hubert-Félix Thiéfaine, Alligators 427

Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-support' in the subject header of the message

More information about the blfs-support mailing list