[blfs-dev] Should I remain an editor?
pierre.labastie at neuf.fr
Mon Jan 12 05:42:50 PST 2015
Le 12/01/2015 14:31, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
> Le 12/01/2015 11:44, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit :
>> There has been increasing demonstrations of disliking what I do in BLFS
>> by almost everybody, either in form or in quality.
>> Some of them seem to judge that I should not be an editor, because of
>> lack of knowledge: Chris and William Harrington are clearly between
>> If this is what all editors think, I would like to be informed, in order
>> to leave.
>> I do like many people here and very much. I do like editing BLFS to keep
>> it up to date.
>> I would like to know if I'm still considered qualified.
> Please, stay with us. Or better said, allow us to stay with you, since
> you have been the principal editor lately.
> I admire the pace at which you are able to do updates. I'd like to be
> able to be as fast as you, but I can't (to much regular work ATM,
> anyway: I do not even build anything from scratch ;-).
> I do not remember what W Harrington has said, but I have seen comments
> from Chris about Poppler. I think you should just take them as people
> asking "why are you doing this way?" and not as people saying "you are
> doing the wrong way". Don't forget that "svn blame" is the same
> command as "svn praise", and means "svn annotate"...
Forgot to remove the SPAM header in the preceding message, sorry!
More information about the blfs-dev