[blfs-dev] A proposal

Bruce Dubbs bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Tue May 14 20:00:42 PDT 2013


Rob Landley wrote:
> On 05/14/2013 12:03:37 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Rob Landley wrote:
>>
>>> I'd link to the actual post under
>>> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev with my
>>> suggestions of obvious cleavage lines to break BLFS into separate
>>> books, but the mailing list archive is 404.
>>
>> Try searching
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org/
>
> That archive doesn't go back far enough. (January 2012.) And
> archive.org hasn't recorded the actual archive since 2007...
>
> Ah, here we go:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel/20066
>
> In which I said:
>
>> Suggestions are welcome. Volunteers are required. LFS is skating by
>> with
>> only two people contributing. BLFS needs much more support than that.
>
> I've used BLFS to build basic X11 support, and I've used it to build a
> few servers.  I cherry picked because building the whole thing is
> ridiculous.

That's the design of BLFS.  You are supposed to pick what you think you 
need.

> Possibly it's time to split the thing into smaller chunks?  The layers I
> see are (roughly):
>
> 1) Infrastructure (chapters 3, 5-8, 10-12).
> 2) Networking (chapters 4, 13-22)
> 3) Multimedia (chapters 9, 23-25, 31-44)
>
> And then separate appendices on KDE and Gnome and XFCE and such.
>
> What I'm looking at is "what might people want to skip?"  A headless box
> may not need any of the multimedia stuff.  A DVD player may not need any
> of the networking stuff.  (It's likely that #2 and #3 are going to need
> things out of #1, but they need stuff out of the base LFS too,
> prerequisites are inevitable you just try to keep them under control.)

We've gone through this before.  The problem is that there are too many 
inter-dependencies.  Right now we are looking at creating a separate 
branch for those packages that need systemd (e.g. most recent Gnome).

   -- Bruce




More information about the blfs-dev mailing list