changes for consolidation
bookreader at gmx.com
Fri Mar 19 09:38:00 PST 2004
On Friday 19 March 2004 15:46, Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> >Reinhard wrote:
> >>What I consider 'suboptimal' is the definition of all kde-entities in one
> >> file (I haven't seen another chapter doing so).
> >>Most of the BLFS-chapters follow the rule, that there is an entity file
> >> and one or more content files, where all files of the same package have
> >> the same name. The content files have an additional suffix somewhat
> >> phony about the type of content.
> >I will check your patches once again and get back to you on that.
> Your reorganization looks good. Makes it inline with the other packages,
> at the same time it does not need multiple changes for a single kde
> increment. In my first pass of the patch, I had thought that you had
> made each kde package independent from each other (which would require a
> change in all the entity files if a version is incremented).
Thank you very much for your closer look!
My intention was to improve the book, without any harm to nobody.
So if you now say, my changes where ok, I'm very glad.
Let me know, if I can help you with more editing.
More information about the blfs-dev