gtk+2.4.0 released

Dagmar d'Surreal dagmar.wants at
Fri Mar 19 09:36:49 PST 2004

On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 01:29, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> On Don, 2004-03-18 at 23:14, Kelledin wrote:
> > Presumably Gnome 2.6 will take care of most or all of this; it's 
> > supposedly due out pretty soon.  Still, I'm considering advising 
> > the Gnome developers to exclude those flags in "release" 
> > packages.  That sort of thing is good for developers (the same 
> > way "gcc -Wall -Werror" is) but causes problems for end-users 
> > trying to compile "released" packages.  Beyond the annoyance of 
> > having a compile break, it can also cause latent instability 
> > even if the package appears to compile successfully.
> This has already been done, at least most of the packages now include
> these flags only in maintainer builds. Gnome 2.6 (as of RC1) builds of
> course seamless without any Makefile modifications.

Actually, I spoke too soon.  After about a half-dozen recompiles...

audacity: relocation error: /usr/lib/ undefined
symbol: _gtk_accel_group_attach

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/", line 13, in ?
    from wxPython.wx import *
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/wxPython/", line 20,
in ?
    import wxc
ImportError: /usr/lib/ undefined symbol:

The irksome thing is that I've seen commentary on the Gtk+ list (from
some prudent Googling) to the effect that this function isn't something
wxGTK should be messing with.
The email address above is phony because my penis is already large enough, kthx. 
              AIM: evilDagmar  Jabber: evilDagmar at

More information about the blfs-dev mailing list