OpenSSL 0.9.7d

Dagmar d'Surreal dagmar.wants at
Fri Mar 19 02:25:51 PST 2004

On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 15:26, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:14:39 -0600
> Dagmar d'Surreal <dagmar.wants at> wrote:
> > So are you volunteering to make a patch that adds the new linux-athlon
> > target to it?
> Oh all right then, so you had to lay down the challenge didn't you :) 
> Here it is, although it's only tested on this *one* box which happens to
> be an Athlon XP with gcc-3.3.3.  This should be safe across gcc versions
> (the athlon cpu targets were only added in 3.0, with athlon-xp appearing
> in 3.1 and later), but I've not added the athlon-{tbird,4,mp}
> configurations as I don't have access to that hardware.  This did pass
> `make test` by the way.  No, I'm not submitting this upstream...yet. 
> I'd prefer for it to have all athlon targets in there (including AMD64
> if possible), and of course to undergo more thorough testing.

Hmm... I usually do it by using -mcpu arguments in the spirit of the
linux-k6 and linux-ppro targets, but I doubt it makes much difference. 
Looks fine to me.
The email address above is phony because my penis is already large enough, kthx. 
              AIM: evilDagmar  Jabber: evilDagmar at

More information about the blfs-dev mailing list