matthew at linuxfromscratch.org
Tue Jun 29 11:24:14 PDT 2004
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:31:34 -0700
"Jim Gifford" <lfs at jg555.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruce Dubbs" <bdubbs at swbell.net>
> To: "BLFS Development List" <blfs-dev at linuxfromscratch.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 11:32 AM
> Subject: Re: net-tools
> > Matthew Burgess wrote:
> > > Bruce et al,
> > >
> > > Do you mind if you take net-tools off of LFS' hands? There's been
> > > a discussion at
> > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2004-June/046960.html
> > > to move LFS over to iproute2. However net-tools offer
> > > some...err...tools... that are useful and complement iproute2's
> > > offerings. Would BLFS have a problem in nicking net-tools off us,
> > > as we obviously don't want it to end up in the equivalent of
> > > /dev/null.
> > We need to take a look at what net-tools offers beyond iproute2.
> > One thing to consider is whether or not iproute2 offers ifconfig and
> > netstat. I believe these programs are required for either LSB or
> > POSIX compliance (or both). You may want to check this out and use
> > it as a factor in deciding about replacing net-tools.
> > -- Bruce
> > --
> iproute2 offers a simliar interface for ifconfig, but nothing to
> netstat, that
> is the reason we are asking for it to go into BLFS.
Additionally, I couldn't find any mention of either 'ifconfig' or
More information about the blfs-dev